Whether the judge in the Southern District of Mississippi erred by ordering the 60-month supervised release revocation sentence at issue to run consecutively to the previously ordered 110-month sentence in the Northern District of Mississippi, when the Northern District judge ordered the sentences to run concurrently.

Whether a district court erred in ordering a 60-month supervised release revocation sentence to run consecutively to a previously imposed 110-month sentence when the sentencing court in the original case ordered those sentences to run concurrently