1. whether a post-conviction petitioner must prove a successful Batson challenge would change the outcome of the trial to show Strickland prejudice.

2. whether the Mississippi Supreme Court violated due process by holding trial counsel waived Clark's Batson rebuttal arguments, rendering him ineffective, but then refused to review Clark's ineffective assistance claim on post-conviction.

Whether a post-conviction petitioner must prove a successful Batson challenge would change the trial outcome to establish Strickland prejudice, and whether the Mississippi Supreme Court violated due process by finding trial counsel waived Batson rebuttal arguments while refusing to review the resulting ineffective assistance claim on post-conviction