1) Whether tte District Court exclusion of an material witness testimony was reasonable especially being
a mariner of the Court and then depending upon tine testimony of an informant vino has since camitted additional
crimes and offered testimony to obtain a lighter sentence since his previous allegations in the case at hand?

2) Vtether the District Court erred ty accepting an affidavit and making conclusionary assurpticns rather
than callin g the affiant into an evidentiary hearing?

3) Vhetter the District Court and Circuit Court erred? not having an evidentiary hearing and settling- for
assuntions rather than allowing witness available to care testify in open Court?

Whether the District Court erred in excluding material witness testimony and relying on informant testimony from a witness with incentive to testify falsely, and whether both courts erred in accepting affidavits and conclusory assumptions without conducting an evidentiary hearing with live witness testimony