1. Does California's doctrine of judicial exhaustion violate the Supremacy Clause under Williams v. Reed, 145 S.Ct. 465 (2025)?

2. If so, does this Supremacy Clause violation invalidate the California DRE reciprocal disciplinary proceeding based on the Supremacy Clause violating California State Bar proceedings?

3. Does a Supremacy Clause violating proceeding fail to meet the requirements for the application of Younger abstention, as the Seventh Circuit held in SKS & Associates, Inc. v. Dart, 619 F.3d 674 (7th Cir. 2010)?

4. Should this Court resolve the circuit conflict between the Ninth Circuit's opinion in this action and SKS, supra?

5. Were the DRE proceedings invalid because there was no right to a jury even though such proceedings would be deemed legal in the courts of England in 1791 and financial penalties and restitution can be ordered thereunder?

Does California's doctrine of judicial exhaustion violate the Supremacy Clause under Williams v. Reed?