No. 25-6793

Roman Flores v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2026-02-11
Status: Pending
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedIFP
Tags: autonomy-right capital-murder criminal-defense guilt-concession law-of-parties sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether McCoy v. Louisiana prohibits only explicit admissions of guilt, or also bars functional concessions — such as conceding elements, conditional authorizations to convict, or conceding predicate offenses that establish guilt under accomplice or law-of-parties theories — when those concessions override the defendant's objective of maintaining innocence.

2. Whether the Sixth Amendment autonomy right recognized in McCoy v. Louisiana is violated when defense counsel, over the defendant's express insistence on innocence, authorizes the jury to convict the defendant of a lesser included offense that functions as the predicate offense for capital or felony murder under an accomplice-liability theory.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether McCoy v. Louisiana prohibits only explicit admissions of guilt or also bars functional concessions that override a defendant's objective of maintaining innocence

Docket Entries

2026-03-25
Response Requested. (Due April 24, 2026)
2026-03-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/2/2026.
2026-03-05
Waiver of right of respondent State of Texas to respond filed.
2026-03-05
Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.
2026-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2026)

Attorneys

Roman Flores
Merel Elianne PontierAttorney at Law, Petitioner
State of Texas
Andrew SmithHarris County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Joseph Peter CorcoranOffice of the Attorney General of Texas, Respondent