1. IF THE AT ONE POINT ALLOWS THIS INSTANCE GROUNDS FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT INCLUDING LEGAL WAS RULE MOTION INSUFFICIENT AS THE MISTAKE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ITSELF IF THE JUDGES HARBOR A

2. WHY WAS THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT QUIRTS IN ASSIGNING MOVLY DEFECTIVE CLAIMS ON DINGEY CLAIMS AND ADOPTED BY THE DISTRICT COURT TIME. IF IT COULD BE DETERMINED THERE WAS LANGUAGE IN

3. IF THE CASES RUNG NUMBER WAS ITEMIZED AND MODIFIED FOR AN ALTERED PROCEEDING WHY DIDN'T THE DISTRICT COURT APPOINT A DIFFERENT JUDGE TO THE CASE THEREAFTER MODIFYING THE DISPOSITION?

4. IF ANY GROUNDS FOR RELIEF APPEARED WIN ON THE MERITS WHY WAS THE PLAINTIFF'S BASIS THE CLAIM DESIGNED IN A FILED MEANING WHAT GROUNDS MAY COULDN'T BE REGARDED OF THE LAW AND RULE OF LAW?

5. IF EXHAUSTION OF REMEDIES WAS NOT AVAILABLE WHY AM I THE PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DURING ISSUE LOURD WIT

6. DIDN'T HAVE PLAINTIFF'S WHEREUPON WHY WAS THE DISTRICT JUDGE IDENTIFY FAIL TO TESTIFY RELIEF NOGA IWIL DURING FINAL JUDGE OPERATION PROCEDURE?

Question not identified.