No. 25-6756

Jacklin Cheramy v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2026-02-09
Status: Pending
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-procedure federal-statute predicate-offense recidivist-enhancement sentencing-guidelines state-conviction
Latest Conference: 2026-03-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether, consistent with federal statute mandating the application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing, a sentencing court must look to the validity of a state prior at the time of federal sentencing to determine whether the state conviction qualifies as a predicate offense for a recidivist sentencing enhancement under the United States Sentencing Guidelines?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether, consistent with federal statute mandating the application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing, a sentencing court must look to the validity of a state prior at the time of federal sentencing to determine whether the state conviction qualifies as a predicate offense for a recidivist sentencing enhancement under the United States Sentencing Guidelines?

Docket Entries

2026-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
2026-02-18
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-02-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2026-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2026)

Attorneys

Jacklin Cheramy
Bernardo LopezFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent