No. 25-6754
Kendrick Simpson v. Christe Quick, Warden, et al.
IFP
Tags: eleventh-amendment ex-parte-young federal-civil-rights rooker-feldman section-1983 state-procedural-rule
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Rooker-Feldman and the Eleventh Amendment jurisdictionally bar a § 1983 challenge to a state procedural rule announced in a state court decision that did not reach the merits of a claim purely based on state law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Rooker-Feldman and the Eleventh Amendment jurisdictionally bar a § 1983 challenge to a state procedural rule announced in a state court decision that did not reach the merits of a claim purely based on state law
Docket Entries
2026-02-11
Brief of respondent Christe Quick, et al. in opposition filed.
2026-02-11
Application (25A897) referred to the Court.
2026-02-11
Petition DENIED.
2026-02-11
Application (25A897) for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Gorsuch and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
2026-02-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
2026-02-09
Application (25A897) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Christe Quick, et al.
Zachary Paul West — Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Kendrick Simpson
Emma Victoria Rolls — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner