No. 25-6674

Justin K. Eaton v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2026-01-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure circuit-split commission-authority congressional-review due-process sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference: 2026-02-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. Can U.S.S.G. §1B1.13(b)(6) be held to be an "excess of authority" by the Commission when Congress has reviewed and ratified that guideline pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §994?

II. Does the 8th Circuit's practice of denying pro se inmates the opportunity to brief their appeals violate the Due Process Clause of the 5th Amendment and the Federal Rules of Procedure?

III. Does a summary denial bereft of reason satisfy the requirement of "Rita v. United States," 551 US 338 (2007) that the record reflects the Court considered the parties' arguments?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines §1B1.13(b)(6) exceeds the Sentencing Commission's authority when Congress has reviewed and ratified the guideline under 28 U.S.C. §994

Docket Entries

2026-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2026-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/27/2026.
2026-02-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-02-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 2, 2026)

Attorneys

Justin K. Eaton
Justin K. Eaton — Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent