No. 25-6653
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court sentencing-factors statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2026-02-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the district court obviously err by considering the retributive factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A), in violation of Esteras v. United States, 606 U.S. 185 (2025), when it revoked Campos's supervised release?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court err by considering retributive factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) when revoking supervised release?
Docket Entries
2026-02-23
Petition DENIED.
2026-01-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-26
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2026-01-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 23, 2026)
Attorneys
Randy Campos
Kristin Michelle Kimmelman — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent