1. Whether this Court should exercise its
supervisory authority under 28 U.S.C.
§165 1(a) to resolve a structural conflict
created when two federal courts —the D.C.
District Court and the Middle District of
Florida —asserted jurisdiction over the same 8
U.S.C. § 1447(b) matter simultaneously,
resulting in irreconcilable orders and a
breakdown in the lawful allocation of federal
judicial power.

2. Whether the continued suppression of
Petitioner 's federal immigration A-File by
DOJ, USCIS, and DHS —despite its central
role in multiple proceedings across multiple
courts —constitutes a structural due-process
violation that no single lower court has the
authority to remedy, thereby requiring this
Court 's intervention to preserve the integrity
of the federal judicial process.

3. Whether the paralysis in the D.C. Circuit,
caused by DO J's procedural default,
unresolved conflicts of interest, and the
inter-court jurisdictional collision involving
Petitioner 's case, presents an exceptional
circumstance warranting the issuance of a
supervisory writ to restore judicial
functionality and ensure access to appellate
review.

Whether the Supreme Court should exercise supervisory authority to resolve a jurisdictional conflict between federal courts and address potential due process violations in an immigration case