1) Did 3rd Circuit Court err by blatantly accepting
District Court 's erroneous interpretation on a
County Prothonotary-signed court order, not
signed by a Judge, violating 5 U.S.C.
§552a(b)(H) and causing a Circuit split?

2) Did 3rd Circuit and District Courts err in their
opinion and judgement that it is "inapposite " to
D.C. Circuit 's previous ruling on issues of
material fact remaining with respect to Privacy
Act violation claims in Bartel case, causing a
Circuit split?

3) Did 3rd Circuit/District Courts err by implicitly
accepting "COMITY ' as a mechanism
permitting agency DOE to release Privacy
documents for a criminal case circumventing
the exceptions under 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b) (3), (7),
(11), ignoring Kalkines warnings causing a
Circuit split?

4) Did the 3rd Circuit/District Courts err on
Privacy Act routine use under subsection 5
U.S.C. §552(e)(3)(C) for Manivannan case from
previous rulings by 9th (Covert), 3rd (Britt) and
D.C. (USPS) Circuits, causing a divided
opinion?

5) Did the 3rd Circuit/District Courts err in not
considering that the agency DOE conduct is
willful in providing privacy documents for a
criminal proceeding, violating Privacy Act
exceptions, routine use and Kalkines!

Did the 3rd Circuit Court err by accepting District Court's interpretation on a County Prothonotary-signed court order not signed by a Judge, violating 5 U.S.C. §552a(b)(H) and causing a Circuit split?