(1) Where State Prosecutors knowingly used and failed
to correct false sworn testimony in connection with
the plea such as at the plea colloquy, in the factuabasis proffer
and at sentencing, does this circumstance undermine the
voluntariness of the plea agreement and fall under a duprocess
violation announced in Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959), Giglio
v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and Brady v. United States,
397 U.S. 742 (1970).

(2) Was The Arizona Superior Court who knowingly was
aware that the plea agreement conviction was procured
through fraud and dueprocess violations required to overturn
the conviction as announced in Ferrara v. United States, 456
F.3d 278 (1st Cir. 2006).

Whether state prosecutors' knowing use of false testimony undermines plea agreement voluntariness and constitutes a due process violation