1. Whether the Supreme Court should exercise its supervisory power under Rule 20 and the All Writs Act to restrain a state judge who continues to act without venue or subject matter jurisdiction and after removal to federal court, in defiance of 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d) and the Fourteenth Amendment.

2. Whether the Court should direct Kansas courts to restore Petitioners parental rights and enforce federal due-process and ADA protections where the state judiciary has refused to act and dismissed Petitioners writ of prohibition for lack of jurisdiction, leaving no forum for relief.

Whether the Supreme Court should exercise supervisory power to restrain a state judge acting without jurisdiction and enforce federal due process protections