I. Is the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in United States v. Williams, 113 F.4th 637 (6th Cir. 2024) unconstitutional because it allows a judge to determine a fact that should be presented to a jury and violates the right to remain silent?

II. Must a vagueness challenge, or even overbreadth challenges, to 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) be reviewed under the particular facts of the case at bar or should Second Amendment issues be reviewed the same as First Amendment Freedoms?

III. Does the criminalization of possession of a weapon in a person's home pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §924(c) violate the Second Amendment?

Whether the Sixth Circuit's ruling in United States v. Williams unconstitutionally allows judicial fact-determination that violates a defendant's right to a jury trial and right to remain silent