1. Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments are violated when a sentencing judge, rather than a jury, finds facts that otherwise alter the minimum and/or maximum prescribed sentencing range that a defendant is exposed to; where those facts were not submitted nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013) and this Court's recent decision in Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S (2024)?

Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments are violated when a sentencing judge finds facts that alter sentencing ranges without jury determination beyond a reasonable doubt