No. 25-6478
Jeremy Edward Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment harmless-error miranda-rights self-incrimination
Latest Conference:
2026-02-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. DID THE THIRD CIRCUIT ERR BY ASSUMING EVEN IF THERE WAS A MIRANDA VIOLATION, THE VIOLATION WAS HARMLESS?
a. Did the Third Circuit err by not determining that there was a Miranda violation?
b. Did the Third Circuit err by determining that even assuming there was a Miranda violation, the violation was harmless?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Third Circuit err by assuming a Miranda violation was harmless and not determining whether a Miranda violation occurred?
Docket Entries
2026-02-23
Petition DENIED.
2026-01-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 4, 2026)
Attorneys
Jeremy Johnson
Christopher Opiel — Opiel Law, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent