No. 25-6446
David Allen Benson v. Superior Court of California, Orange County, et al.
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance mandamus-petition sixth-amendment speedy-trial
Latest Conference:
2026-02-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was Petitioner denied his right to speedy trial, even his criminal Trial has been delayed for six years without his consent?
2. Did Petitioner suffer ineffective assistance of counsel when his forced-upon appointed attorney refused to file a Motion to Dismiss in the Respondent Superior Court?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Petitioner denied his right to speedy trial when his criminal case was delayed for six years without his consent, and did he suffer ineffective assistance of counsel when his appointed attorney refused to file a Motion to Dismiss?
Docket Entries
2026-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/27/2026.
2025-12-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2026)
Attorneys
David Benson
David Allen Benson — Petitioner