1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on its
face or as applied to Petitioner because, consistent with theSecond Amendment, the federal government may not permanently disarma citizen based exclusively on a prior felony conviction.

2. Under Esteras v. United States
, 145 S. Ct. 2031 (2025),
should Petitioner's prison sentence for violating a condition ofsupervised release be vacated because the district court relied on18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A).

Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on its face or as applied to Petitioner because, consistent with the Second Amendment, the federal government may not permanently disarm a citizen based exclusively on a prior felony conviction