Loni Nicole Granger, et al. v. Lauren J. King, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, et al.
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit violated petitioners ' Fifth Amendment due-process rights by summarily
denying in-forma-pauperis status and dismissing three related appeals as "frivolous " without addressing
more than a dozen pending substantive motions.
2. 'Whether the repeated re-labeling of duly filed writs of mandamus and sanctions motions as
"miscellaneous pro se filings " constitutes a denial of meaningful appellate review.
3. Whether assigning the same judicial panel to all three appeals and issuing virtual'y identical
dismissal orders violated the Ninth Circuit 's random-assignment procedures and the constitutional
guarantee of impartial tribunals.
Whether the Ninth Circuit violated petitioners' Fifth Amendment due-process rights by summarily denying in-forma-pauperis status and dismissing appeals as 'frivolous' without addressing pending motions