Six (6) District Anems of Prosecution Misconduct Alleged [Cumulative Effect Amount to Fundamentally Undermine Possibility of Getting a Fair Trial in Which's Life Town.

2. Discussing Pre-Trial Plea Negotiations (Inadmissible)

3. Questions Why the Pet Did Not Confess to the State, Court, to Atony, Hid Side of the Story? Why Wait Y SMS, Tal Tumef Why Did Goto that Awd Not Plea?

4. When the Defense Objected, the Court Sustained, But the Prosecution Commend Adie Same Questions, [Gwote Count Sosrtney?

5. When the Pet Ward Mien Multiple Questions, to Show the Jury How he Hero the Gow Wen Fe Shot bel Wife (the Wtom), Golden Hours

6. The Prosecution Played the Av—la of Minka A-Ulolation Tunermocatio Wt Cre No Th4nserw'Pts to the Jury Mon Count, td Done fon Aut orten Avoid Mecomnes.

Two Anem of Kinse of Discretion by Trwal Count During Fo Mismulan Rechning the Profecettion "Ofeninc the Dooe" Ator Ally, to Discussing Inadmassi@ble Pre-Twal Plea Negotiations

Q1. Did the Tent Cook Ena by Giving a Simple, Lecmty Con Linsufr Cest [root What Rend With the Plofecution 4 Ocfense] Howe-twe" Conanive quay fysimvenion 2 Aditonal, the Ond -Line" Contin ve quay Inetyction) Wat Gluen stilts the Jury Wd Esterlng, Waling, and Getting Seated, Wad the Use Vad at All?

Two Anem of Count Mhule of Discretion Aas Phofecution—Emspon Buc

Q1. Whit ConsTitute " Surreen [Nuocktion of Ought Td Counsel? Tre 4 Lik Mt Viotation Interrogation Amd Evidenes I Re couenen Ap Renwatos? the Pet Mild Fon Counter omy Tobe Commuting Tee Tn TenneG anon of Per (A Fonetenen., No Law KWouseDGE) No ThansemlPts to the Jury Ano the Coukr, H Done Fok A Oren

Aig Retonmnes Quine Ttt. How bio the ProletuTa Atemot D Content the Theawsowpt of the Moll (MPD Mtint Avdio Neecorepy of the Tie

Whether the cumulative prosecutorial misconduct and trial court errors fundamentally undermined the petitioner's right to a fair trial