1.) Whether Nu appointment of Coun Se | who labors
\wh eres \S o bust ok. Aescrehiow 2
——Aypetlate Counsels fale '

2.)\whedher \ mdi' Dlea colloquy establishes
Knowingly Voluntarily entered due to
etal Conte, as of Ineffective
assistance oft Coun s« | O appellate counsels

S whether | und made valid Knowing, and
Voluntary Wailers ot counse| +o proceed
ere Se, Cont lict Cree Counst| waive Lor
owl) Sentencing ond nae Diveet appes |
by appellate Counsel Lay lure to
qnveshigealt ow Aircet appes | v

L Meher ttityonun sutfercd Complete and constnchi
aaa of mount | Unwaivable con fc4s of interest S,
Staneltcant cont\ier§ of vaterest's pand yy \ Courts
a huse's ot Ayserehions resulting wa ess
of yurisaichons +o a mel conte an
Sen¥ence rendering ~ ove conviction "e

Whether the appointment of appellate counsel who fails to investigate direct appeal issues constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel and whether a plea colloquy establishes a knowing and voluntary waiver of counsel