I. WAS MR. SKYLER'S PLEA OF GUILTY KNOWING OR VOLUNTARY, WHEN THE FACTUAL BASIS IS INSUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH A VIOLATION OF THE HOBBS ACT OR A CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE THE HOBBS ACT?

II. DID THE DISTRICT COURT'S FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 11 VIOLATE DUE PROCESS AND MR. SKYLER'S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS?

III. WAS THE FACTUAL BASIS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT MR. SKYLER'S HOBBS ACT CONSPIRACY CONVICTION?

IV. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY ALLOWING THE GOVERNMENT TO VIOLATE THE PLEA AGREEMENT?

V. DID THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERR BY NOT FOLLOWING THIS COURT'S HOLDING IN SANTOBELLO v. NEW YORK, 404 U.S. 257 (1971)?

Question not identified.