No. 25-6257
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation constitutional-amendment due-process evidence-disclosure fair-trial supreme-court-review
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Nebraska Supreme Court has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by the United States Supreme Court or has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of the United States Supreme Court in respect to disclosure of evidence at trial after the witnesses at issue had already testified in violation of Ramos' rights to a fair trial and due process under the 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Nebraska Supreme Court has decided an important federal question regarding disclosure of evidence at trial in violation of constitutional due process rights
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-08
Waiver of Nebraska of right to respond submitted.
2025-12-08
Waiver of right of respondent Nebraska to respond filed.
2025-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2025)
Attorneys
Eric Ramos
Nebraska
Cody Steven Barnett — Nebraska Department of Justice, Respondent