No. 25-6250
Richard Ruston v. United States
Tags: circuit-split federal-criminal-law sentencing-conditions statutory-construction statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the "and" in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(1), as well as the "and" in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), as cross-referenced in section 3583(d)(1), means "and," or whether the "and" means "or," as the Tenth Circuit held below?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 'and' in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(1) means 'and' or 'or' as interpreted by the Tenth Circuit
Docket Entries
2026-02-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 19, 2026.
2026-02-09
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2026-02-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 17, 2026 to March 19, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2026-01-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 17, 2026.
2026-01-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 16, 2026 to February 17, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-17
Response Requested. (Due January 16, 2026)
2025-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-09
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2025)
Attorneys
Richard Ruston
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent