1. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause is violated when a state court enforces a settlement entered over a litigant's explicit objection while under psychiatric duress.

2. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment protects against government-compelled disclosure of medical records obtained through secret subpoenas without notice, contrary to Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589 (1977).

3. Whether a state appellate court may permanently bar a litigant from all pro se filings without individualized, narrowly tailored findings, consistent with State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999), and the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

4. Whether, after a federal remand, state courts may refuse to adjudicate remaining issues, contrary to Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 517 U.S. 706 (1996).

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause is violated when a state court enforces a settlement entered over a litigant's explicit objection while under psychiatric duress