No. 25-6136

Damien Antione Jones v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-11-17
Status: Pending
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-waiver collateral-review constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process plea-agreement
Latest Conference: 2026-02-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

Petitioner is serving a sentence for an offense that was later declared unconstitutional by this Court in United States v. Davis, 588 U.S. 445 (2019), and sought post-conviction relief to vacate that now unconstitutional sentence. The district court denied relief based on the wording of the appeal and collateral-review waiver contained in petitioner's plea agreement. The Fifth Circuit, both in this appeal and in a related appeal, affirmed the denial of relief in a 2-1 decision in both cases, holding that even though petitioner is serving prison time for an offense that was declared unconstitutional by this Court, he cannot have this unconstitutional sentence vacated because he waived that right in his plea agreement's collateral-review waiver. Other circuits would grant relief in similar circumstances and vacate this unconstitutional sentence even when there is a valid appeal or collateral-review waiver in the plea agreement. This Court will resolve this circuit split in Hunter v. United States, Sup. Ct. No. 24-1063 (cert. granted Oct. 10, 2025).

The questions presented in the underlying appeal on which a certificate of appealability was granted were: (1) whether the appellate-review waiver in petitioner's plea agreement bars his Davis claim; and (2) whether petitioner's appellate-review waiver is unenforceable under the miscarriage-of-justice exception. Stated another way, the question presented in this certiorari petition is whether it violates federal constitutional due process for a defendant who pleads guilty and waives the right to appeal or seek collateral-review for a conviction that is later found to be unconstitutional by this Court, to then be forced to serve the unconstitutional sentence because of the prior plea agreement's waiver of appeal or collateral-review?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether it violates federal constitutional due process for a defendant who pleads guilty and waives the right to appeal or seek collateral-review for a conviction that is later found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court to then be forced to serve the unconstitutional sentence because of the prior plea agreement's waiver of appeal or collateral-review

Docket Entries

2026-01-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-21
Waiver of Damien Antione Jones of the 14-day waiting period submitted.
2026-01-21
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2026-01-16
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-12-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 16, 2026.
2025-12-11
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-12-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 17, 2025 to January 16, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-10-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 17, 2025)

Attorneys

Damien Antione Jones
Gregory Don Sherwood — Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent