1. Whether a Federal Court may grant summary affirmance of an appeal taken from the district court order denying transcription of audio and video recordings when they were prior testimony and custodial examinations a established in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 51 (2004).

2. If so, whether a Federal Court may grant summary affirmance where it mandate conflicts with this Court holding in Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962).

3. If so, whether a Federal Court may grant a party summary affirmance where its mandate sanctions a lower court's departure from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as it relates to Griffin v. Illinois and its progeny.

4. If so, whether a Federal Court may grant a party summary affirmance where its mandate sanctions a lower court's departure from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as it relates to Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56(1982).

Whether a Federal Court may grant summary affirmance of an appeal when its mandate conflicts with Supreme Court precedents regarding transcription of audio and video recordings