Question Presented (from Petition)
The Fourth Amendment protects citizens in public spaces from being seized by law enforcement without reasonable suspicion that they have committed a crime, unless there is an objective basis to believe that they are armed, dangerous, and the officer's safety is at issue. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968). When a citizen is present in a historic "high crime" area, and located near another individual who is viewed by police committing a minor misdemeanor (here possession of an open container of alcohol), does this permit a seizure of the citizen?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a citizen can be seized by law enforcement in a high-crime area based on proximity to another individual committing a minor misdemeanor without individualized reasonable suspicion
2026-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2026.
2026-02-17
Reply of Claude Coleman submitted.
2026-02-17
Reply of petitioner Claude Coleman filed. (Distributed)
2026-01-30
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-12-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 30, 2026.
2025-12-29
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-12-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 31, 2025 to January 30, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-01
Response Requested. (Due December 31, 2025)
2025-11-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 8, 2025)