1.
IS NON-PARTY, AND NON-CITED, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
("USA ") AND DIST. CT. JUDGE, DONALD E. WALTER, ONE AND
SAME INDIVIUAL PERSON, AND/OR, ONE AND SAME FEDERAL
OFFICER, AND, IF NOT, WAS PETITIONER 'S SUIT FILED IN
CADDO PARISH STATE COURT EVER REMOVED TO FEDERAL
COURT, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE RECORD SHOWS THAT ONLY
NON-PARTY THE USA APPEARED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL?
2.
IS IT A CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY OF THIS U. S. SUPREME COURT
TO ISSUE A MANDAMUS TO THE U. S. 5th CIRCUIT ORDERING IT
TO PERFORM ITS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY: REVERSE THE JULY
25, 2024 JUDGMENT DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE ALL CLAIMS
OF ALL PLAINTIFFS ' IN THEIR STATE COURT FILED SUIT
ILLEGALLY REMOVED TO THE W. D. CT. OF LA, SHREVEPORT -
DIVISION & FOR ALL ORDERS/JUDGMENTS ISSUED BY ANY
DISTRICT COURT BE DECLARED VOID SINCE A "USURPATION
OF POWER " WAS COMMITTED BECAUSE ONLY FEDERAL
JURISDICTION WAS THAT OF THIS U. S. SUPREME COURT?
3.
IS THE U.S. 5™ CIRCUIT NEGLECTING ITS CONSTITUTIONAL
OBLIGATION BY REFUSING TO FOLLOW ITS OWN PRECEDENT
ISSUED IN: ZIEGLER V. CHAMPION MORTG. CO., ET AL. , 913 F.2d
228 (1990), WHERE ITS OWN MOTION THE APPELLATE COURT
REVERSED THE DISTRICT COURT AND REMANDED THE CASE?
4.
IS THIS SUPREME COURT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE A MANDAMUS
TO THE 5th CIRCUIT TO PREFORM ITS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY
REVERSING THE DIST. COURT AS IT IS CLEAR THAT FOR
PLAINTIFF, L & M HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, INC., THE JULY 25,
2024 JUDGMENT CONFUSES THE STATE COURTS INREGARDS
TO ALL PLAINTIFFS PROCEEDING IN THE STATE COURTS
AGAINST ALL RESPONDENT, FOR ALL OF THEIR CLAIMS?
5.
IS THIS SUPREME COURT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE A MANDAMUS
TO THE 5™ CIRCUIT SINCE THERE HAS BEEN JUDGMENTS HAS
ISSUED AGAINST THE CORPORATION ON THE MERITS OF ITS
CLAIMS AND/OR A MONEY SANCTIONS JUDGMENT ISSUED
AGAINST IT ALTHOUGH, IT, NEVER APPEARED IN U. S. COURT?
6.
DOES THIS COURT HAS A CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO ISSUE A
MANDAMUS TO THE 5th CIRCUIT ORDERING IT TO PERFORM
ITS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY AND DECLARE ALL JUDGMENTS
VOID ISSUED BY ALL THE DISTRICT COURTS BECAUSE THEY
COMMITTED A "USURPATION OF POWER, " AND THE VOID
JUDGMENTS HAVE CAUSED AND CONTINUE TO CAUSE THE
STATE COURTS TO SUSTAIN R
Whether the U.S. Supreme Court has a constitutional duty to issue a mandamus to the 5th Circuit to reverse void judgments and address alleged jurisdictional errors in a long-running civil litigation