No. 25-6012

Julia Dixon v. Medhost Dispatcher, et al.

Lower Court: Massachusetts
Docketed: 2025-11-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection indigent-plaintiff medical-malpractice
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether requiring an indigent, self-represented plaintiff to post a mandatory medical tribunal bond as a condition for access to a malpractice trial—without any waiver or reduction —violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

2. Whether the dismissal of civil rights and malpractice claims for failure to comply with a procedural rule (Massachusetts Rule 9A), without consideration of pro se status and medical urgency, violates an individual 's constitutional right to access the courts.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether requiring an indigent, self-represented plaintiff to post a mandatory medical tribunal bond as a condition for access to a malpractice trial violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 3, 2025)

Attorneys

Julia Dixon
Julia Dixon — Petitioner