1. Whether District court departed from essential requirements of law, by not allowing the Record of Appeal to be Supplemented as U.S. 4b Provide a Complete rendition of the facts; the Bench of Constitutional Grants of Due Process, hinder the ability to demonstrate fully, without said Supplement.

2. Whether District court departed from essential requirements of law, by not voiding the Evidentiary Hearing to Cure the Conflict on most vested on the Courts failure to Cure the error.

3. Whether SUPREME COURT, departed from essential requirements of law, by issuing their decision to dismiss The Motion To Revoke Discretionary Jurisdiction; 9 April 2, 2025, Rather than May 14, 2025 OPINION.

4. Whether District court, departed from essential requirements of law, by not affording Petitioner the right to "confront free witnesses" on Evidentiary hearing on a NEWLY Discovered EVIDENCE.

Whether the District Court departed from essential legal requirements by not allowing the Record of Appeal to be supplemented, not curing evidentiary conflicts, not invoking discretionary jurisdiction, and not affording petitioner the right to 'conflicts free hearings' on newly discovered evidence