No. 25-5922
Victor M. Hernandez-Carrasquillo v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2025-11-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether evidence was sufficient to justify the district court denial of Rule 29 of the Fed. R. Crim. P.
Whether the district court committed reversible error by imposing a procedurally unreasonable sentence
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether evidence was sufficient to justify the district court denial of Rule 29 of the Fed. R. Crim. P. and whether the district court committed reversible error by imposing a procedurally unreasonable sentence
Docket Entries
2025-11-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-10-30
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 20, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Victor Hernandez-Carrasquillo
Miguel Oppenheimer — The Oppenheimer Law Group, Petitioner