Comes Now trot petitioner and Mawnan' Sochus Meadors, moves Pio honorable Court im MUNG wahiiy Pray Constitution,| Righia has been deprived oP, on ariminal Court GaSe "TAYYBOFGO! ond ZACMEFOIIG DO, \athy on Case FRINGIIGO! wae TL not prooteuted wsitihine S years oF gommitwent date oF denvey B¢) BOI and was Sentenced on H[i[2%e Why was T not discrarged Prom sy 4 year Formal Probation. after maximum Custody aredits had. Creeededt Wihy wae Tin Court on 4/ul2y wren Fieve, 'hia Wd proloable oy ius nalgle Cause?

On Case ZUCMICFOIIA ZO] why wad Z not fin Court Within 4G hours oF anwict 7? gurovent tO pend Code B25. Why did I sit im Custody For 2% actual DayS. aur BtiNe booked and aveceted on Q/firjay wry dab L Tihegalhy Arraigned On October 42024 cl aid tre distvicr Aor rey File Te Case an Rif qfa4 ww penal Code "TRG. Statutory ime mits exceed ed .C Pa has EE Net im pre rant nary heaeing within i "YS purwant ho 354 of the. California penal ote? Wry wos My Due preces® Rignt® peprived and. Niolatad wy Statutory evorS aad quer looted 7 Why aid TE get forced ty tial, Pound wily and 0 el gihewie A any of tony! ations Oe ea fine

Why was I not discharged from a 4-year formal probation after maximum custody credits had exceeded, and why were my due process rights violated by statutory errors?