No. 25-5853
Clarence Santiago v. United States
Tags: circuit-split criminal-conduct federal-procedure sentencing-disparity sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2025-11-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
In assessing whether two defendants are similarly situated for purposes of § 3553(a)(6), are courts required to consider their actual offense conduct?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
In assessing whether two defendants are similarly situated for purposes of § 3553(a)(6), are courts required to consider their actual offense conduct?
Docket Entries
2025-11-17
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/14/2025.
2025-10-28
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 10, 2025)
Attorneys
Clarence Santiago
Samantha Jean Kuhn — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent