1. Whether in determining whether a constitutional error had a prejudicial effect on the outcome of a trial a court must consider only that evidence that was presented to the jury at the trial.

2. Whether the prejudice from the Giglio violation in this case met the standards for relief under Giglio and Brecht.

Whether a court must consider only trial evidence when determining the prejudicial effect of a constitutional error or if post-verdict evidence can be used in assessing prejudice