No. 25-5796

Daniel Matthew Matlock v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-10-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-statute federal-question mens-rea sexual-abuse statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the term "knowingly" in 18 U.S.C. § 2242(1) (sexual abuse) applies only to "causing another person to engage in a sexual act" or whether it extends also to "threatening or placing that other person in fear."

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the term 'knowingly' in 18 U.S.C. § 2242(1) applies only to 'causing another person to engage in a sexual act' or whether it extends also to 'threatening or placing that other person in fear'

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-10
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2025)

Attorneys

Daniel Matthew Matlock
Gregory Mitchell Acton Sr.Acton Law Office, PC, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent