Should the First Amendment provisions to the U.S. Constitution addressing the making of any law abridging the freedom of speech; and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances continue being denied?

Should the Fourth Amendment provision to the U.S. Constitution addressing the making or enforcing of any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; binding all States from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, or denying to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws continue being denied?

Should petitioner continue being denied service of complaint?

If federal rule of civil procedure 15; amended and supplemental pleadings does not limit the number of times a complaint may be amended before service, why would the U.S. Eastern District Third Circuit Court?

If all provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. §1915 and local rule of appellate procedure 24.1 address prisoner, should any portion thereof be used to deny petitioner service of complaint?

Whether the First and Fourth Amendment constitutional protections of free speech, due process, and equal protection continue to be denied in a civil rights proceeding