No. 25-5729

Raylon Browning v. Georgia

Lower Court: Georgia
Docketed: 2025-09-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process ineffective-assistance pretrial-incarceration pro-se-representation speedy-trial
Latest Conference: 2025-11-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the trial court violated Browning's Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial by failing to try his case within two complete court terms after he filed a notarized Constitutional Demand for Speedy Trial with Certificates of service, and whether Browning is entitled to an acquittal of all charges for failure to try a Demand for Speedy Trial.

Whether the trial court violated Browning's Sixth Amendment right to counsel by denying his motions to proceed Pro Se and failing to appoint a new Public Defender, despite Browning filing several motions for both, which included several reasons for his Public Defender providing Ineffective Assistance of Counsel.

Whether the trial court held an illegal bench trial to determine competency of Browning, after Browning had already been determined competent to stand trial by the Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD).

Whether the trial court failed to address a motion to quash a severely errored Indictment, with errors including the Indictment being unsigned by the District Attorney, the charging of 2 offenses in one count, the charging of 2 counts of murder for one alleged victim, illegal charges that do not apply to Browning's case, and a victim claiming an offense appeared on the day after Browning's arrest and incarceration when the victim's name and offense never appeared in police reports or Discovery.

Whether the trial court failed to address a motion to Suppress evidence, including 8 illegal arrest warrants due to significant errors, an illegal arrest based on illegal access unsecure and illegal evidence obtained from the illegal arrest, 2 illegal search warrants issued with grounds on the Search warrants being illegal arrest and evidence illegally obtained from the illegal arrest, and Surveillance Videos that could have been Suppressed.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a defendant's prolonged pretrial incarceration and denial of pro se representation constitute a violation of due process and speedy trial rights

Docket Entries

2025-11-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-07-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 27, 2025)

Attorneys

Raylon Browning
Raylon Browning — Petitioner