No. 25-5726

In Re David C. White

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-09-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: None
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1 illegal Administrative Law courts convened in defiance of Loper Light.

8. Shall judges in the Ninth Circuit persist in violation of Loper Light, thus denying citizens 14th Amendment equal protection under the law, compared to citizens in other jurisdictions such as the Tenth Circuit, which complies with Loper Light, per their home page?

9. Shall the phrase "between a state" in Article III of the U.S. Constitution be construed also as referring to Citizens of the same state in determining jurisdiction?

10. Shall the Circuit Court of Appeals violate its protocol for selecting a unique panel of judges for each case tried when a litigant has simultaneously presented two or more unique cases for review?

41. Shall the Circuit Court of Appeals refer a PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DISPOSITIVE ORDER to the same panel of judges whose extreme bias in dismissing that very case is being challenged by pro se or any litigants?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified.

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-11-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-11-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-09-15
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2025)

Attorneys

David C. White
David C. White — Petitioner