1. Whether the United States Court pf Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
erred in its decision to dismiss the Petitioner 's 'application for leave to
file a second or successive habeas corpus petition, ' based on AEDPA 's
gatekeeping provision 28 U.S.C. §§2244(b)(2). When this Court held
that "second or successive language is a term of art that incorporates
pre-AEDPA abuse of the writ principles. "

2. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for Eleventh Circuit
violated the Petitioner 's constitutional rights when it erroneously
dismissed his 'cause and prejudice ' claims to overcome the procedural
default as required by the procedural default and abuse of the writ
doctrines.

Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in dismissing a second or successive habeas corpus petition under AEDPA's gatekeeping provision and cause and prejudice standard