Whether Dawson u. Delaware's I First Amendment prohibition
against using a defendant's "abstract beliefs" (in this case, an interest in
Nazi literature and Petitioner's SS lightning-bolt tattoos) as sentencing
evidence applies to non-capital felony cases and more importantly, should
this Court revisit Dawson and adopt an appropriate standard to guide a
Dawson relevancy inquiry?

Whether the First Amendment prohibition against using a defendant's 'abstract beliefs' applies to non-capital felony cases and whether the Court should revisit Dawson's standard for relevancy inquiry