No. 25-5625

Fred Krug v. New Jersey State Parole Board

Lower Court: New Jersey
Docketed: 2025-09-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure ex-post-facto parole-law retroactive-application sentencing-benefit
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Ex Post Facto Clause protects against the retroactive removal of a substantial sentencing benefit that is conferred after the date of offense, or whether courts are limited to comparing the new law against the law in place at the time of offense.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ex Post Facto Clause protects against the retroactive removal of a substantial sentencing benefit that is conferred after the date of offense, or whether courts are limited to comparing the new law against the law in place at the time of offense

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-08
Waiver of right of respondent New Jersey State Parole Board to respond filed.
2025-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 14, 2025)

Attorneys

Fred Krug
Kevin Scott FinckenauerNew Jersey Office of the Public Defender, Petitioner
New Jersey State Parole Board
Christopher Josephson — Respondent