No. 25-5594

In Re Brian D. Dubuc

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-09-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: due-process equal-protection non-discretionary-mandate reservation-lands treaty-rights tribal-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Weather the Non Discretionary mandate of the state supreme court
Can be refused execution by the state trial court or restrict removal to
tribal or US District Court where ""No Paper " Is Received from Plaintiff
that Triggers removal time to prevent tribal and US court jurisdiction.

2) Whether in reservation lands lost in Allotment period recovered by lawful
title by a registered member is preempted and trusted by law from State Action
under treaty (Aug. 6, 1846. 9 Stat., 871. Ratified Aug. 8. 1846. Proclaimed
Aug. 17, 1846).federal statue (S. Doc. No. 33, 55th Cong., 3rd Sess. (1898))
25 C.F.R. 151.2(d), 25 CFR § 151.11(a)(2)(b).

3) Whether Registered members of Cherokee Nation in Indian Territory were
Deprived of lands, business, rights , and equity's without due process, equal
protection, by Impartial courts of Oklahoma and the United states secured
under the Treaties 1833-1846 Oklahoma Constitution Article 1 § 3 US Const
Art. I, § 8, Art. VI, cl. 2 , Contrary to Haines VS Kerner 404 US 519
520 (1972)

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a non-discretionary state supreme court mandate can be refused execution by a state trial court or restricted to tribal or US District Court jurisdiction when no plaintiff documentation triggers removal time

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-07-16
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2025)

Attorneys

Dubuc, In Re Brian D.
Brian D. Dubuc — Petitioner