1. Did the Ninth Circuit err and abuse their discretion in failing to grant a Certificate of Appealability (CoA) based on the fact that the Washington State Attorney General conceded the due process violation in the District Court res ponse?

2. Did the Ninth Circuit err and abuse their discretion in failing to grant a Certificate of Appealability (CoA) based on the fact that this was an issue of first impression requiring judicial resolution?

3. Did the Ninth Circuit err and abuse their discretion in failing to grant a Certificate of Appealability (CoA) based on the fact that Buzzard did raise the argument that the End Of Sentence Review Committee (ESRC) illegally and unconstitutionally changed his sex offender registration level without an administrative appeal process as required to what private of his parole being denied by SPAR Kes, was raised at every level of the state courts and has procedurally exhausted?

4. Did the Ninth Circuit err and abuse their discretion in failing to grant a Certificate of Appealability (CoA) based on the fact that this issue is "capable of repetition, yet evading review" and, was already happened before, so far, in 3081, and 3093 at?

5. Did the Ninth Circuit err and abuse their discretion in failing to grant a Certificate of Appealability (CoA) based on the fact that continuing case that involves violation non-doctrinal violation?

Did the Ninth Circuit err and abuse their discretion in failing to grant a Certificate of Appealability (COA) based on various procedural and substantive grounds?