No. 25-5531

In Re Omar Rashad Pouncy

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-09-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: habeas-corpus mandamus panel-rehearing sixth-circuit supreme-court-precedent writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Should a writ of mandamus issue directing the Sixth Circuit to fulfill its obligation® as observed in Missouri v. Jenkins, 495 U.S. 33, 46 n. 14 (1990)® to fully and fairly decide the merits of the timely filed petition for panel rehearing (and its supplement)?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should a writ of mandamus issue directing the Sixth Circuit to fulfill its obligation to fully and fairly decide the merits of the timely filed petition for panel rehearing (and its supplement)?

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-07-23
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2025)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Omar Rashad Pouncy
Omar Rashad Pouncy — Petitioner