No. 25-5530

Edmond George Parenteau v. United States

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2025-09-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: color-of-law constitutional-law due-process judicial-procedure right-to-travel statutory-authority
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

(1) . How is it possible, according to constitutionally protected rights, the United States, and States are not acting outside their statutory authority regarding the right to travel?

(2) . How is it possible, according to constitutionally protected rights, the United States, and States are not forcing, under Color of Law, Sovereign people to register their automobiles through the DMV departments when their own rules and regulations prescribe it a voluntary program?

(3) . How is it possible, according to constitutionally protected rights, United States and States through the Departments of DMV can convert a right to travel into a privilege to drive?

(4) . How is it possible, according to the Constitution and laws, that the Judge's UNREPORTED OPINIONS Case No. 1:2-cv- 00736 -KCD and U. S. Appeals Court For the Federal Circuit Case# 2420-2140 did not make Critical Errors that resulted in many violations?

(5) . How is it possible that an Unreported Opinion supersedes constitutional law?

(6) . How is it possible, according to constitutional law, that an opinion can have any basis according to law without any findings of facts and conclusions of law?

(7) . How is it possible, according to constitutional law, that the judges' orders by both Courts rejecting the filing of a collateral attack did not act under Color of Law resulting in violation of due process of law?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States and States are acting outside their statutory authority regarding the constitutional right to travel and the conversion of travel rights into driving privileges

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-06
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2025)

Attorneys

Edmond George Parenteau
Edmond George Parenteau — Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent