Whether an Appellant that Proceeded On Appeal Pro Se Oriel Intention^ did So and Without a Course/ and (AUfMout Qnj notice <% Appearance fronn arug Counsel f and With Cl Motion andlbr Po-hce fo_ proceed Pro Se In th-? Appellate Courh, Present a, Question u(A/h-ethlr h^ (Yl&j Proceed Pro Se f/ Un The Whether the Gwemowit □r^uawt ttW Cf the district Court hud Hot €nter-ed O final Un a CnnninaJ Case nt m a hotous pretriUal final Jud^-eflnent Orders appeal Can Stan fl th-C Appe lla/fg^ CouM dccvsion ho dismiss On appeal

Whether a Writ of Manda mus IS a proper \Cerw to Chcd l-fng e flhe district Court's Improp-er denia/ Of Designation Of [Word on Appeals and after :he AypeUanfs Severed Motions Comp^lhny Orullbr W,ltesfin<y {W Designa tion Dt Record On fl-ppecds in Che Apppellcch ' Court Qnd District Cowl ?

tXIbefaer a fflfrho n 4o dismis s p,n appeal bj a cun Attorney om a Criminal Case in /be dtsfricf Court Can Stand Q decision Of fhl Appellate Court fa diamrs; _ On appeal Wherr^ilnen an Jtppellant proceeded on Motion andlor notice fa proceed on an Appeal Pro $e 7

Whe-lber (YlandrifrtiS is a proper remedy i/uhun Ibe (district Court disregafaed dhe appellafa'-s Cmut Jun delicti on pendency the pretHcd final hidyment Ordftr appeal , andlor far Appellate Coot -CalUol Po pmperV j exercise its p&uoer Qndlor Jurisdiction. Orullh f the government antllor the district foarf brought fae ProSeCci-hoo bj a reason forbidden Qndlor Contrwve n \wifa jfaeJ^

Whether an Appellant proceeding Pro Se without counsel and without notice can challenge a district court's decision through a writ of mandamus or appeal when the court allegedly disregarded appellate jurisdiction during a pretrial final judgment order