No. 25-5502

Aisha Asha Bradley v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2025-08-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-1443 federal-appellate-court jurisdiction-determination removal-procedure statutory-directive third-circuit
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Federal Appellate Court for the Third Circuit, ignore statutory directive 1443(1), by NOT doing a jurisdiction determination under 28 U.S.C. §1443(1); when Petitioner-Bradley listed that her Removal is pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1443(1), as is required by 28 U.S.C. §1446(d)? see exhibit 2244- Notice of Removal Discussing Statute 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), p. 1, 8,16, see Case 2.24-CV-06054-JS Document 2 Filed 11/12/24 Page 2, 9, 17, see Case 2.24-cv-06155-JS Document 2 Filed 11/12/24 Page 2, 9,17, see Case 2.24-cv-06156-JS Document 2 Filed 11/12/24 Page 2, 9,17.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Federal Appellate Court for the Third Circuit ignore statutory directive 1443(1) by not performing a jurisdiction determination under 28 U.S.C. §1443(1) when Petitioner Bradley listed her Removal is pursuant to that statute?

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-08-22
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 29, 2025)
2025-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 29, 2025)

Attorneys

Aisha Bradley
Aisha Asha Bradley — Petitioner
Lyle R. Harrison
Lyle Roger Harrison — Petitioner