1. Whether the lower courts, acting under statutory and de facto authority, committed
reversible error in refusing to recognize or adjudicate matters grounded in equity, trust,
and unrebutted sworn affidavits presented by a living man standing in private capacity as
Executor-Beneficiary, thereby denying the sacred right of remedy in equity.

2. Whether the summary dismissal of a verified judicial misconduct complaint, followed by
coordinated retaliation, procedural obstruction, and systemic suppression of filings across
multiple jurisdictions, constitutes a structural denial of due process and meaningfill
access to remedy, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

3. Whether the repeated rejection, sealing, misclassification, or concealment of verified
equity instruments and private trust filings amounts to an unconstitutional infringement
of die Executor-Beneficiary 's First Amendment right to petition, and violates the
judiciary 's own duty to maintain an open, fair, and uncorrupted court of record.

4. Whether the Third Circuit and subordinate courts, by refusing to address the merits of
trust claims, equitable declarations, and unrebutted affidavits —dismissing them as
"frivolous " without evidentiary hearing —breached their solemn judicial oaths under 28
U.S.C. § 453, and abandoned their constitutional duty to preserve equity and conscience.

5. Whether this Supreme Court is constitutionally obligated to exercise its ultimate
equitable jurisdiction, where inferior tribunals have closed the doors of conscience, left
no adequate remedy at law, and permitted unrebutted facts, trust claims, and fiduciary
breaches to remain unaddressed, contrary to fundamental judicial maxims and the public
trust

6. Whether the systemic refusal to audit, certify , or verify the equity record across multiple
jurisdictions —-despite formal requests and unrebutted affidavits —constitutes a
constructive denial of access toa lawful forum, inviolation of the First and Fifth
Amendments and the equitable duty to preserve the integrity of the record.

7. Whether the coordinated sealing, relabeling, and removal of verified equity filings from
public access —without notice, hearing, or rebuttal —constitutes fraud upon the court and
a breach of the judiciary 's constitutional obligati on to maintain a transparent and
uncorrupted record.

Whether the lower courts committed reversible error in refusing to recognize equity claims and denying access to judicial remedy